A Comprehensive Study of Compact Fluorescent LED Replacements

1. Introduction to Compact Fluorescent LED Replacements

Introduction

Compact fluorescent LED replacements (CFLs) have been predominantly designed in 2010 to be an alternative to both incandescent and commonly integrated CFL bulbs. These replacements have recently gained popularity and have flooded the market as they are promoted as energy-saving bulbs that will reduce electrical costs. There are several companies that have taken advantage of the amazing rejuvenated interest in mid-power LEDs to produce low-cost, low-lumen packaged lamps that directly replace 13W to 18W CFL tubes. The manufacturing process of replacing the entire compact fluorescent lamp with a standard retrofitted base is discussed. It is argued that although the new replacement may provide enhanced lighting characteristics, increased lifetime, and reduced maintenance costs, it may be hard to build strong retrofit bases and to reduce both costs and risks for lamp makers.

Replacing a T8 system with harmonically controlled LED alternatives could lead to an increase in system efficacy of 20-60%. Moreover, the system efficacy would improve to 30-100% for fixtures of T12. The growing environmental appeal of these latest replacements, as well as all luminous sources of solid state, is increasing in lighting. People now view LED as a cleaner, environmental lighting power supply than the traditional incandescent lamp, becoming so popular that numerous utilities in the United States have made demand-side funding business cases built just on the incidences of switching all incandescent to CFL and early market-based LED goods. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis dealing with CFL LED replacements. The idea behind the paper is to drive through a standard although extensive inquiry into these kinds of items. Later in the paper, we focus on a detailed structure of the flyer alternatives before completing the paper with a wide analysis and a comparison with and among earlier dynamic solutions to vacuum fluorescent, solid state, and other alternatives.

2. Types of Compact Fluorescent LED Replacements

There are many types of compact fluorescent replacements available in the market, but the type that the majority of consumers have been choosing is what is commonly referred to as a T3-shaped light bulb. This is the bulb with a spiral shape illuminated with a fluorescent coating in the T3 version. Typically, the more common shape took a round or A-shape LED form factor. Different options include many standard shapes and candle versions. The candle bulbs have also been made in a variety of shapes and sizes for all kinds of decorative chandeliers and lighting fixtures. For use with traditional dimmer wall switches, dimmable CF LED replacement options are available. Finally, there are some specialty types of bulbs that are intended to be used in recessed can lighting and have become popular because of the halogen-like LED quality from such a fixture. These last types of lamps come in a slightly larger shape that most people won’t hear and are sometimes referred to as BR30 and are used for recessed can or track lighting. All CF LED replacement bulbs, or direct replacements, have a wide variety of wattages and lumen outputs – from 300 lumens to 3000 lumens while only using from 3.5 to 100 watts. These options are made available, thanks to the many advances in LED chip technology which have allowed manufacturers to pack more LED chips into a particular size, which in turn means more light can be emitted from a smaller LED light bulb. It is amazing how many different versions have become available since the first mass-produced LED that looked like a compact fluorescent came on the market! Many new brands have entered the market as consumer demands have increased in recent years, and all have their unique styles, and fit and finishes. When reading through the content of these products, it is amazing to realize how much the category has evolved. One of the most noticeable changes is the dramatic reduction in the size of the LED circuit installed within, which has helped to produce a smaller, sleeker-looking lamp. Other elements like the number of hours of life, color temperature ranges, wattage, and each product’s lighting efficacy are the same. Manufacturers suggest that the better qualities for a consumer to consider when purchasing a replacement CFL LED light bulb are the shape, the size in light, color temperature, and wattage. The shape, size in light, and finishes often come down to personal aesthetics and the look the consumer is after in the particular lighting application.

3. Benefits and Drawbacks of Compact Fluorescent LED Replacements

There are several advantages to using a compact fluorescent LED replacement. An energy analysis of the replacement from the previous section showed a minimum reduction in energy of around 40%, with a potential of over 80%. Additionally, the described devices have lifespans nearly tenfold that of a CFL at 10,000 hours. These energy savings, combined with the significantly reduced environmental impacts of production and disposal, make the devices effective in greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Moreover, the lower heat output has the potential to provide additional air conditioning cost savings. However, there are drawbacks to implementing the technology. As shown in the respective analysis, the devices can be many times the cost of standard incandescent bulbs and can potentially experience compatibility issues with existing fixtures and controls. There are further questions of brand-to-brand consistency, where there appear to be no current universal standards for performance, and even rated models showed inconsistencies through popular consumer reports. Beyond the technical specifications of an LED bulb, user satisfaction was found to be heavily related to two main performance qualities: flicker and color rendering.

Most concerningly, flicker was generally found to be above accepted levels in many consumer reports. A variety of devices were tested, and inconsistent performance was found not only between quality segments but within the same brand and model. Finally, differences in user expectations and knowledge regarding color rendering performance were discussed, with primarily conflicting opinions. Although consumers were generally not fully aware of the effect of light on color from bulb to bulb, many were not content with the change in color from a newly purchased product as compared to a standard light bulb. Whether design or knowledge-based, the majority of the public require some level of color in their light. The research group is attempting to better classify the variety of user preferences so that the satisfaction of a higher guiding performance standard can be met.

4. Comparison with Traditional Compact Fluorescent Bulbs

Opting between a compact fluorescent light bulb and one of the compact fluorescent LED replacements is a decision that faces many U.S. consumers today. Both types of bulbs have their advantages, and we examine the issues that consumers should consider to aid in choosing between the two bulb types. This section will break down where the CFL LED replacements shine and where traditional compact fluorescent bulbs still hold the edge. To wrap up the section, we use data to compare the CFL LED replacements with traditional incandescent lamps.

Overall, LED replacements offer an advantage over compact fluorescents in energy efficiency. Both lumens per watt produced by an LED optical distribution and the drive make an LED optical design less problematic than a compact fluorescent optical design. LEDs also have a significantly longer lifetime than compact fluorescent tubing, though the initial purchase price of a compact fluorescent lamp is less expensive than the LED replacement. Compact fluorescents, in general, however, have an operational cost advantage for specific light quality needs. Compact fluorescent lamps also offer an almost perfect solution for a desk lamp's light spectrum needs, though the most common design of an LED desk lamp has many drawbacks for use while reading.

The expected standard of light intensity from a light source is an important parameter to consider when purchasing for residential, industrial, or commercial purposes. Unfortunately, very few compact fluorescent LED replacement companies list their lumen ratings. About one-third of the companies offer consumer feedback data on the number of lumens that an LED replacement produces. Of this amount, the customers who had earlier used compact fluorescent bulbs claimed that LED bulbs provided significantly brighter light more often than they were too bright when compared to the replacement's compact counterpart.